Thirty-five cataloged items across seven governance architectures, twelve hardware platforms, six software reference architectures, seven flagship simulations, and the publication record. Each card states what the item is, what evidence supports it, what its status label means, and what a reviewer should know before opening it. The complete 28-page technical catalog is available as a PDF, and the full index as CSV.
This catalog presents public-source, self-authored research artifacts. Evaluation is simulation-based unless explicitly stated otherwise. Hardware references are design specifications unless physical testing is specifically identified. The catalog does not represent official government endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Catalog status labels distinguish between operational physical hardware, browser-based simulations, formal models, reference designs, and future validation plans. A listed reference design should not be read as a certified product or fielded system.
Continuous sensor-trust scalar in [0,1] via weighted Dempster-Shafer fusion across internal consistency, cross-sensor agreement, temporal stability, and physical plausibility.
U.S. Provisional 64/002,453 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18936251
FORMAL MODEL + BROWSER-BASED SIMULATIONSingle-author research; simulation and formal evidence only; not deployed.
Graded four-level authority (A3-A0) with asymmetric hysteresis; TLA+ verified across 48,751 reachable states and 8 safety properties.
U.S. Provisional 63/999,105 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18861653
FORMAL MODEL + BROWSER-BASED SIMULATIONSingle-author research; simulation and formal evidence only; not deployed.
Deception prior P(adversarial) that adjusts authority downward when inputs are likely manipulated; separates honest confusion from hostile attack.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19043924
BROWSER-BASED SIMULATIONSingle-author research; simulation and formal evidence only; not deployed.
Byzantine-resilient consensus (3f+1) with CUSUM anomaly detection; a single compromised node cannot determine consensus alone.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19015517 · MIT license
FORMAL SPECIFICATION + SIMULATIONSingle-author research; simulation and formal evidence only; not deployed.
Consequence-scaled mandatory deliberation window before irreversible action; five-state circuit breaker; fail-safe default on timeout is abort.
U.S. Provisional 64/005,607 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19015618
BROWSER-BASED SIMULATIONSingle-author research; simulation and formal evidence only; not deployed.
Deterministic GREP-phase recovery to defined safe states with a terminal non-compensatory policy gate; verified by 10-million-iteration enumeration.
U.S. Provisional 64/000,170 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18917790
FORMAL ENUMERATION + SIMULATIONSingle-author research; simulation and formal evidence only; not deployed.
Quantifies decision-time compression and cross-domain escalation cascades in AI-enabled command and control; 600 Monte Carlo runs.
SSRN ID 6176802 (working paper)
BROWSER-BASED SIMULATIONSingle-author research; simulation and formal evidence only; not deployed.
Low-cost reference testbed for authority-governed autonomy; Raspberry Pi 5 + ESP32 running SATA-HMAA-CARA; 350 simulation runs, no unsafe actions in simulation.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19143190 · ~$484 BOM
DESIGN SPECIFICATION; PHYSICAL VALIDATION PENDINGBuild in progress; results to date are simulation outcomes.
Trust-governed flight autonomy; Cube Orange+ with Jetson Orin NX companion and MAVLink HIL bridge; 250 simulation runs across 5 adversarial scenarios.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19128769 · ~$4,200 BOM
DESIGN SPECIFICATION; PHYSICAL VALIDATION PENDINGBuild in progress; no flight testing performed.
Reference hardware instantiation of the full nine-module pipeline with a hardwired normally-open effector interlock; 72 components.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19177472 · ~$139K BOM
REFERENCE DESIGN ONLY; PHYSICAL VALIDATION PENDINGHighest-cost platform; not built; MIL-STD-810G is a design target.
Authority-governed drive-by-wire safety architecture; three-leg redundant fail-safe relay; 1,200 simulation runs, no unsafe actions in simulation.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19232130 · ~$16.3K BOM
SIMULATION-BASED EVALUATION; PHYSICAL VALIDATION PENDINGISO 26262 ASIL-D is a target pathway, not a certification.
Hydroacoustic sonar, magnetic anomaly detection, AIS spoofing detection; sea-state authority damping; 84 components, IP68 enclosure target.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19246785 · ~$43K BOM
REFERENCE DESIGN ONLY; PHYSICAL VALIDATION PENDINGDesign complete; not built.
Protection node for power-grid, water, and pipeline operations; IEC 61850 GOOSE, Modbus, PROFINET; SIL-3 safety relay; 92 components.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19277887 · ~$11.6K BOM
REFERENCE DESIGN ONLY; PHYSICAL VALIDATION PENDINGSIL 3, NERC CIP, FIPS 140-2 are design targets.
Radiation-tolerant onboard authority under signal delay; RTG4 FPGA hot redundancy; 91 components; 15-document engineering package.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20183269 · ~$505K BOM
DESIGN SPECIFICATION ONLYEarliest-maturity platform; V&V specified but not executed.
Passive detection-to-authority governance across radar, RF, EO/IR, Remote ID, LIDAR; federal-to-SLTT handoff; ~75% reuse from BLADE-EDGE.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20299604 · ~$43.5K BOM
REFERENCE DESIGN ONLY; SIMULATION-BASED EVALUATIONAligned with EO 14305 and FY26 NDAA; alignment is a research mapping.
Tamper-evident hardware root of trust; non-exportable ECDSA keys in CC EAL6+ secure element; verified by adversarial emulator, 275/275 checks.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20299821 · ~$199 BOM
EMULATOR-VERIFIED DESIGN; PHYSICAL VALIDATION PENDINGSilicon not built; emulator evidence only.
BFT two-phase consensus across N = 10/50/500 agents; safe-halt-by-default under denied RF; TLA+ verified (5 safety, 3 liveness). Governs decision authority and audit, not weapons.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20351198 · ~$1,333/node
SIMULATION-BASED EVALUATION; PHYSICAL VALIDATION PENDINGTestbed at TRL 2; consensus results are simulation outcomes.
Fail-closed, bump-in-the-wire appliance adjudicating each cross-boundary command across four OT regimes; malformed input fails closed.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20342067 · 1U appliance
REFERENCE DESIGN ONLY; SIMULATION-BASED EVALUATIONNot deployed in any facility.
Authority arbitration routing each transaction to clearance, review, confirmation, or hold; retrospective swarm-review for low-and-slow activity.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20374692 · ~$9,228 BOM
SIMULATION-BASED EVALUATION (SYNTHETIC DATA ONLY)Synthetic data only; not deployed in any institution.
Authority-lifecycle shim wrapping any LLM-based agent runtime; T3-T0 gating, per-tool HKDF tokens, spawn quorum, injection-collapsing input trust.
15-section specification + working simulator · hardware companion DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20299821
REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONSingle-author research; not deployed in any production environment.
An assurance gate a system must clear before it is permitted to act; addresses the validation gap named in the 2026 National Cybersecurity Strategy.
Specification + governor console
REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONSingle-author research; not deployed in any production environment.
Gates AI actions across the IT/OT boundary; authorizes deterministic safety logic and does not make the safety decision itself.
Specification + governor console
REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONSingle-author research; not deployed in any production environment.
Constrains what a defensive cyber-reasoning agent may do and when; treats the agent as a black box; governance only, no offensive function.
Specification + governor console
REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONSingle-author research; not deployed in any production environment.
Gates autonomous spacecraft actions under intermittent ground contact; companion to BLADE-SPACE.
Specification + governor console
REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONSingle-author research; not deployed in any production environment.
Governs what an AI under evaluation is permitted to do inside a test environment; aligned with NDAA Sections 1533 and 1534.
Specification + governor console
REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONSingle-author research; not deployed in any production environment.
Six scenarios, 600 Monte Carlo runs, formal property verification, Merkle provenance; models cross-domain escalation cascades.
Client-side, seeded PRNG; bit-exact reproducible · frameworks: ERAM · SATA · FLAME · CARA
BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONDemonstrates governance logic under seeded scenarios; does not prove field performance, hardware timing, or resistance to a live adversary.
Full seven-framework pipeline with PBFT consensus and a Merkle audit trail in a theater-level scenario.
Client-side, seeded PRNG; bit-exact reproducible · frameworks: All seven frameworks
BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONDemonstrates governance logic under seeded scenarios; does not prove field performance, hardware timing, or resistance to a live adversary.
Air, maritime, and kinetic lanes with Byzantine fault isolation.
Client-side, seeded PRNG; bit-exact reproducible · frameworks: HMAA · CARA · MAIVA
BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONDemonstrates governance logic under seeded scenarios; does not prove field performance, hardware timing, or resistance to a live adversary.
Blue-on-blue interdiction via a common operating picture.
Client-side, seeded PRNG; bit-exact reproducible · frameworks: HMAA · CARA · SATA · ADARA
BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONDemonstrates governance logic under seeded scenarios; does not prove field performance, hardware timing, or resistance to a live adversary.
Distributed Web Worker nodes, common operating picture, analytics, Merkle audit.
Client-side, seeded PRNG; bit-exact reproducible · frameworks: All seven frameworks
BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONDemonstrates governance logic under seeded scenarios; does not prove field performance, hardware timing, or resistance to a live adversary.
Actor-model mesh with PBFT consensus and an emergent interlock.
Client-side, seeded PRNG; bit-exact reproducible · frameworks: MAIVA · CARA
BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONDemonstrates governance logic under seeded scenarios; does not prove field performance, hardware timing, or resistance to a live adversary.
Zero-dependency kinematic engine with flight-termination authority.
Client-side, seeded PRNG; bit-exact reproducible · frameworks: HMAA · CARA
BROWSER-BASED DEMONSTRATIONDemonstrates governance logic under seeded scenarios; does not prove field performance, hardware timing, or resistance to a live adversary.
Eighteen Zenodo deposits with registered DOIs and fifteen SSRN working papers, with source code under MIT and CC BY 4.0. Public disclosures with permanent identifiers; not peer-reviewed venues.
Zenodo + SSRN + ORCID 0009-0001-8573-1667
PUBLISHED / DISCLOSEDIndependent third-party citation is currently limited; peer-reviewed submission is on the roadmap.
HMAA 63/999,105 · CARA 64/000,170 · SATA 64/002,453 · FLAME 64/005,607, all filed March 2026 with USPTO receipts. Unexamined filings, not granted patents; conversion window to approximately March 2027.
USPTO Patent Center
PROVISIONAL; PENDING USPTO ACTIONProvisional applications establish priority; they are not granted patents.
The Authority Equation (3), The Authority Discipline (4), Autonomous Authority (3), published under the Authority & Architecture imprint; ISBNs via Bowker; Volume I carries LCCN 2026912260.
LCCN 2026912260 · Bowker ISBNs
PUBLISHEDBook series is technical reference material, not peer-reviewed literature.
| EVIDENCE TYPE | WHAT IT IS | SUPPORTS | DOES NOT PROVE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zenodo deposits (18) | Architecture and platform specifications, BOMs, code | Public disclosure, priority, reproducibility | Field performance, certification |
| SSRN working papers (15) | Frameworks and policy analysis incl. ERAM | Public disclosure with permanent IDs | Peer review |
| TLA+ verification (HMAA) | 48,751 reachable states, 8 safety properties | Formal correctness of the authority state machine | Correctness of other frameworks; hardware timing |
| Provisional patents (4) | SATA, HMAA, CARA, FLAME filings | Priority dates and USPTO receipts | Granted patent rights |
| Browser simulations (19) | Seeded, client-side, reproducible | Governance logic behavior under scenarios | Resistance to a live adversary; hardware behavior |
| Reference designs (12) | BOM-level hardware packages | Buildability analysis and cost baselines | Built hardware; measured interlock behavior |
| ITEM | RESEARCH STATUS | EVIDENCE | LIMITATION | NEXT VALIDATION STEP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHREX pipeline (7 architectures) | Formal model + browser-based simulation | DOIs, TLA+ (HMAA), seeded sims | Simulation and formal evidence only | FPGA bitstream + hardware-in-the-loop |
| BLADE hardware platforms (12) | Reference design / design specification | Zenodo deposits, full BOMs | Not built; no physical testing | Build Rover and UAV testbeds first |
| Software reference architectures (6) | Reference architecture | Specifications + governor consoles | Not deployed in production | Independent red-team evaluation |
| Simulation portfolio (19) | Browser-based demonstration | Seeded, bit-exact reproducible runs | Not validated against operational data | Sensitivity analysis; peer review |
| Publications and IP | Published / disclosed | DOI, SSRN, USPTO receipts, LCCN | Not peer-reviewed venues | Peer-reviewed submission; patent conversion by Mar 2027 |
Start with the Executive Overview and System Boundary in the PDF catalog, then BLADE-EDGE and BLADE-CUAS cards above, then run the APEX JADC2 Theater simulation. The program white paper states the proposed physical validation campaign.
Start with the HMAA deposit (TLA+ verification, 48,751 states) and the Rover Testbed package, then the Risk and Limitation Assessment in the PDF. Every simulation is seeded for bit-exact reproduction; verify one independently before reading further.
Start with AUTHREX-AGENT and BLADE-AGENT-HSM, then the AUTHREX-AGENT-CYBER card, then run the AGENT governor console. Alignment references: CISA/NSA/Five Eyes agentic-AI guidance and FY26 NDAA Sections 1513 and 6601.
Start with BLADE-SPACE (15-document engineering package) and AUTHREX-SPACECYBER, then the orbital scenario in the Operational Domains section of the main site. Note: BLADE-SPACE V&V is specified but not executed.
Start with BLADE-MARITIME (sea-state authority damping, acoustic-delay-aware consensus), then the MDO Digital Twin simulation's maritime lane and the maritime mission panel on the main site.
Machine-readable project data is embedded in this page as JSON (view source, #catData) and mirrored in the CSV index. Missing or unverifiable links are marked Needs verification in the source data.